What is the implication of multiple definitions of "Done" across different teams?

Maintaining a separate Definition of Done for each team can be practical as long as it satisfies the minimum quality and completeness standards necessary for the work being delivered. This approach allows teams to work in a manner that best suits their specific needs and project contexts, promoting autonomy and flexibility. Teams may have different technologies, tools, or customer demands that could require varying criteria for what constitutes "Done."

While it’s essential that each team's definition aligns with the overall goals of the organization, diversity in definitions fosters an environment where teams can focus on delivering value in a way that reflects their expertise and circumstances. Moreover, as long as these definitions uphold the agreed-upon minimum standards, they contribute positively to the development process.

The other options hint at the challenges or necessities of standardized definitions, but maintaining different definitions can still lead to effective collaboration if managed properly, highlighting the importance of transparency and communication between teams.