If the Product Owner doubts the quality of the definition of "Done", what should they do?

The appropriate course of action for the Product Owner, when they have doubts about the quality of the definition of "Done," is to discuss it in the next sprint retrospective. This meeting is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to reflect on their work and improve their processes.

During the sprint retrospective, team members can openly communicate about what is working well and what isn’t, including the criteria under which work is considered complete. The definition of "Done" sets the quality standard for the increments produced by the team, and clarity on this definition is critical for ensuring that team members have a shared understanding of quality expectations.

Addressing concerns about the definition during the retrospective allows for collaborative input from the entire Scrum Team, which includes Scrum Master and Developers, fostering an open dialogue about quality and encouraging a culture of continuous improvement. Furthermore, adjusting the definition only after thorough discussion helps ensure that any changes are deliberate and collectively agreed upon, rather than impulsive or unilateral upon the Product Owner’s immediate doubts.

The other options lack the collaborative and reflective consideration needed in Agile practices. Revising the definition immediately could bypass necessary input from the team and lead to misunderstandings. Ignoring the issue entirely compromises the quality of the product and can further complicate future sprints. Consulting